tipičen slovenski družboslovec

citat iz neke tuje bukle

tejko tenejko

za istim sindromom pretiranega zadolževanja trpi tudi Slovenija ( a se komu sploh sanja koliko avtomobilov je kupljenih na lizing?)

oziroma svarjenje pred Sodomo in Gomoro je itak fake

osnoven princip v življenju še vedno velja - ne žri več, kot si lahko privoščiš - če bi se tega principa držala zadostna kritična masa potrošnikov bi ne imel problema z "multinacionalkami" in "socialnimi lenuhi", "umetniki tipa Metelkovci" ...

t wrote on 25.09.2005 at 11:49:33:


veš ljubček - če bi natančno prebral tekst, bi opazil da je tip pomešal hruške in jabolka

plus - računovodski standardi so standardi, ki imajo tako kot ostali zakoni maksimalen doseg teritorialne veljave ...

sinjeoka wrote on 25.09.2005 at 23:15:48:



Veš ljubica, če bi svoje trditve vsaj poskušala tudi argumentirati, bi bila precej bolj verodostojna.

Tip zame ni napisal nič novega, samo to, na kar opozarjajo makroekonomisti - med njimi tudi Soros, ki ga omenja titud.



uživaj!

sinjeoka wrote on 26.09.2005 at 15:59:49:


Jaz pa vidim, da bi to v SLO komot naredila Sinjeoka in Bamby. Če vama zagusti pa prosita t-ja za pomoč.

za tiste, ki vidite Sorosa kot dobrodelneža pa tale članek v premislek:

www.globalresearch.ca
   Centre for Research on Globalisation
   Centre de recherche sur la mondialisation

George Soros: Prophet of an "Open Society"
Karen Talbot

www.globalresearch.ca    4 July 2003

The URL of this article is: http://globalresearch.ca/articles/TAL307A.html

   George Soros: “The billionaire trader has become eastern Europe’s uncrowned king and the prophet of “the open society”. But open to what? by Neil Clark, New Statesman, June 2, 2003

   A review by Karen Talbot

   George Soros, is known as a Hungarian émigré philanthropist, a proponent of human rights and the “open society,” and, just incidentally, a financier ---one of the richest men in the world. Soros recently criticized George W. Bush saying in an article in the Financial Times of London that his administration’s Iraq policies were “fundamentally wrong” and that they are premised on the “false ideology that U.S. might gave it the right to impose its will on the world.” Many of us in the peace movement would say: “he got that right!” We might be inclined to praise him and to believe that this confirms that he really is a “do-gooder”—an image, by the way, that he carefully cultivates, especially through various NGOs. In fact numerous non-profit organizations have received funds from his foundation because they have bought into that perception.

   But let’s take a closer look to see what is motivating Soros. Neil Clark, writing in an incisive article the New Statesman (June 2, 2003), points out that Soros “made billions out of the Eastern currency crash of 1997,” and that he was fined last year “for insider trading by a court in France.” In fact currency speculation is his modus operandi and if this contradicts his pronouncements against “market fundamentalism” and in favor of “civil society, ” well, so be it. In fact, Clark reported that when queried about the turmoil his speculation caused to Far Eastern economies in 1997, Soros replied: “As a market participant, I don’t need to be concerned with the consequences of my actions.”

   But all of this is just the tip of the iceberg. What of the NGOs Soros established and finances? Who are the other leaders of these groups? Clark informs us that at Human Rights Watch, for example, there is Morton Abramowitz, U.S. assistant secretary of state for intelligence and research from 1985-1989` and now a fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations; Warren Zimmerman former ambassador “whose spell in Yugoslavia coincided with the break up of that country”; and Paul Goble, director of communications “at the CIA-created Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty (which Soros also funds).”

   According to Clark, Soros’ International Crisis Group “boasts such ‘independent’ luminaries as the former national security advisers Zbigniew Brzezinki and Richard Allen, as well as General Wesley Clark, once NATO supreme allied commander for Europe. The group’s vice-chairman is the former congressman Stephen Solarz, once described as ‘the Israel lobby’s chief legislative tactician on Capitol Hill’ and a signatory, along with the likes of Richard Perle and Paul Wolfowitz, to a notorious letter to President Clinton in 1998 calling for a ‘comprehensive political and military strategy for brining down Saddam and his regime’.”

   So much for Soros’ opposition to Bush’s Iraq policies.

   There’s more! Who are Soros’s business partners at the Carlyle Group---one of the world’s largest private equity funds, which makes most of this profit from defense contracts? They include the former secretary of state James Baker and Frank Carlucci, former defense secretary, George Bush, Sr, and “until recently, the estranged relatives of Osama BinLaden.” Soros has invested more than $100 million in Carlyle, Clark tells us.

   He also points out that “Soros may not, as sometimes suggested, be a fully paid-up CIA agent. But that his corporations and NGOS are closely wrapped up in U.S. expansionism cannot seriously be doubted.”

   This brings us back to the question; “why has Soros lambasted Bush?” The answer lies in understanding that, more than ever, within the Wall Street power elite there may be differences in tactics but seldom are there significant differences in the end goal---opening the way for the maximization of corporate profits everywhere around the world. Today, there is basically a oneness of purpose in promoting U.S. imperial dominance, and in the process, attempting to solve a deepening global economic crisis by controlling diminishing petroleum and energy resources.

   How does this play out where Soros is concerned? As Clark points out, “Soros is angry not at Bush’s aims---of expanding Pax Americana and making the world safe for global capitalists like himself—but with the crass and blundering way Bush is going about it. By making U.S. ambitions so clear, the Bush gang has committed the cardinal sin of giving the game away. For years, Soros and his NGOs have gone about their work extending the boundaries of the ‘free world’ so skillfully that hardly anyone noticed. Now a Texan redneck and a gang of overzealous neo-cons have blown it”

   Soros’ way is to use a few billion dollars, some NGOs and a “nod and wink from the U.S. State department” to bring down foreign governments that are “bad for business” to seize a nation’s assets, and even get thanked for your ‘benevolence,’” according to Clark. This method has worked for Soros and his cohorts.

   Take the collapse of the Soviet Union, for example. Clark points out that “Soros’ role was crucial: “From 1979, he distributed $3 million a year to dissidents including Poland’s solidarity movement, Charter 77 in Czechoslovakia and Andrei Sakharov in the Soviet Union. In 1984, he founded his first Open Society Institute in Hungary and pumped millions of dollars into opposition movements and independent media. Ostensibly aimed at building up a ‘civil society”, these initiatives were designed to weaken the existing political structures and pave the way for eastern Europe’s eventual exploitation by global capital. Soros now claims with characteristic immodesty, that he was responsible for the “Americanization” of eastern Europe.”

   More recently, there is the case of Yugoslavia. As Clark puts it:

   “TheYugoslavs remained stubbornly resistant and repeatedly returned Slobodan Milosevic’s reformed Socialist Party to government. Soros was equal to the challenge. From 1991, his Open Society Institute channeled more than $100 million to the coffers of the anti-Milosevic opposition, funding political parties, publishing houses and “independent” media such as Radio B92, the plucky little student radio station of western mythology, which was in reality bankrolled b one of the world’s richest men on behalf of the world’s most powerful nation. With Slobo finally toppled in 2000 in a coup d’etat financed, planned and executed in Washington all that was left was to cart the ex Yugoslav leader to the Hague tribunal, co-financed by Soros along with other custodians of human rights, Time Warner Corporation and Disney. He faced charges of crimes against humanity, war crimes and genocide, based in the main on the largely anecdotal evidence of (you guessed it) Human Rights Watch.”

   Clark points out that “since the fall of Milosevic, Serbia, under the auspices of Soros- backed “reformers”, has become less, not more, free. The recently lifted state of emergency saw more than 4,000 people arrested, many of them without charge, political parties threatened with bans, and critical newspapers closed down” This has been so blatant that it was condemned by the UN Commission on Human Rights and the British Helsinki Group

   “Soros has made money in every country he has helped to prise ‘open’. In Kosovo, for example, he has invested $50 million in an attempt to gain control of the Trepca mine complex, where there are vast reserves of gold, silver, lead and other minerals estimated to be worth in the region of $5 billion. He thus copied a pattern he has deployed to great effect over the whole of eastern Europe of advocating ‘shocking therapy’ and ‘economic reform’, then swooping in with his associate to buy valuable state assets at knock-down prices,” according to Clark.*

   In Hungary, Soros is the benefactor of the Free Democrats party “which has pursued the classic Soros agenda of privatization and economic liberalization---leading to a widening gap between rich and poor,” says Clark.

   “The Soros strategy for extending Pax Americana differs from the Bush model, particularly in its subtlety. But it is just as ambitious and just as deadly,” Clark concludes.

   Of course, in the case of Yugoslavia, ultimately the Soros approach was not enough so the overwhelming might of the U.S. military was brought into play.*

    Copyright K Talbot   2003.  For fair use only/ pour usage équitable seulement .


uživajte!

še malo:

William Engdahl: "Was stecht hinter den Wahrungskriegen des George Soros? (What Is Behind the Currency Wars of George Soros?), EIRNA-Studie "Derivate -Die finanzielle Wasserstoffbombe der 90er Jahre" (Derivatives --The Financial Hydrogen Bomb of the 90's).  The influencial Chairman of the Banking Commission in the U.S. House of Representatives, Henry Gonzales, chided the Bush and Reagen administrations for refusing to prosecute the BCCI. In addition the Dept. of Justice repeadedly declined to co-operate in the Congressional investigations into the BCCI scandal and the closely linked scandal of the "Banco Nazional del Lavoro" (BNL). This bank had made billions of dollars from loans that Bush had granted the Iraqi government shortly before the Gulf War. Gonzales had said that the Bush administration had had a Department of Justice which he thought "the most corrupt, most unbelievably corrupt Department of justice that I have ever experienced during my 32 years in Congress".
After the BCCI had been openly accused in the media for transgression of several laws, the New York prosecuting attorney Henry Morganthau announced official charges against the BCCI. Morganthau accused the BCCI of the "biggest banking fraud of the financial world. The BCCI during it's 19 year history operated as a corrupt criminal organization."
One of the directors of the BCCI, the Saudi-Arabian Shiekh Kamal Adham, had been the head of the Saudi secret service during the time Bush headed the CIA.
Not a single Western newspaper has so far uncovered the fact that the Rothschilds group linked with George Soros was at the hub of the vast illegal network of the BCCI. The key person in these activities was Dr. Alfred Hartmann, the managing director of the Swiss branch of the BCCI (Banque de Commerce et de Placement SA), head of the Zurich Rothschild bank AG and member of the board of N.M. Rothschild & Sons in London. He was also on the board of the Swiss branch of the Italian BNL and was vice-chairman of the "N.Y. Intermaritime Bank" in Geneva. A friendly secret service man who had worked on the "Soros" case disclosed that in Sept. 1993 Soros had amassed along with a group of "silent partners", a firtune in excess of 10 Billion dollars to use as a lever to unhinge the European currencies. Among the partners apparently were the little known metal and oil dealer Marc Rich and the Israeli arms dealer Shaul Eisenberg. For decades Eisenberg has been working for the Israeli secret service and has important arms deals in all of Asia and in the Near East. A third partner of Soros is Rafi Eytan who before was the Mossad connection to the British secret service in London.

Basically George Soros is another tool for economic and political warfare in the hands of the Rothschilds. He is among those circles who three years ago started a malicious "Fourth Reich" campaign against the re-united Germany: Soros is very anti-German. In his 1991 autobiography  "Underwriting Democracy" Soros warned of the danger that a reunited Germany could disturb the (power) balance in Europe...It is easy to see how the situation that existed between the wars could come up again. A reunited Germany becomes the strongest economic power and developes Eastern Europe as it's habitat.... a terrible "witches brew". His US contacts put Soros very close to the financial and secret service circles around George Bush. His most important deposit bank and main lender during his attack on the European monetary system in Sept. 1993 was CITICORP, America's largest bank. Soros called upon the international investors to unhinge the Deutsche Mark. When in late 1989 a reunification became probable, a high ranking Citicorp manager who before had been advisor in the Dukakis campaign said: "German unity will be catastrophic for our interests. We have to take action to insure a decline of the Deutsche Mark by about 30% so that Germany will not be able to built up Eastern Germany to become the economic factor within a new Europe."
According to his associates Soros has "an incredible ego". He descibed how during the war in occupied Hungary he could not have survived as a Jew, so he had taken on a second identity. What he did not say, however, was that he let a man shield him from persecution who did wealthy Jews out of their possessions, and that Soros lent him a hand. This is how he "survived" the war, leaving Budapest only two years after it had ended. Although he himself and the Jewish owned media are quick in attacking all his opponents, especially in Eastern Europe, as anti-semitic, his Jewishness is based on parts of the Talmud rather than on his links with Jewish religion or the Jewish people. Outwardly Soros supports a whole spate social activities, like "peace concerts" with Joan Baez, stipends in Oxford for young Eastern Europeans etc...

But reality presents a different picture. Soros is personally responsible for the chaos and "shock therapy" caused in Eastern Europe after 1989. He foisted ludicrous draconian measures upon the weak governments there, which enabled him to buy up resources in wide parts of Eastern Europe at rock-bottom prices.
Take Poland as an example:
At the end of 1989 Soros organized a secret meeting between the communist regime of Rakowsky with the leaders of the then illegal opposition union organization Solidarnosc. The plan he presented to both sides is as follows :
*The communists should let the opposition Solidarnosc take over the government to win the confidence of the people.
*Then the state should deliberatly drive it's own industries and agricultural business to ruin by applying astronomical interest rates, by withholding the necessary state loans and by lumbering the companies with debts they could never repay.
*Then Soros would get his rich international business friends to come to Poland and buy up the now privatized state companies.
The most recent example is the huge steel company "Huta Warsawa", which today, so steel experts say, would cost about 3 to 4 Billion US$ to build if it was built by Western companies. A few months ago the Polish government agreed to take over the "debts" of Huta Warsawa and to sell the company now free of debts for 30 Million US$ to the Milan company Lucchini. To instigate his plan Soros used a young friend, the Polish-Jewish economic advisor Jeffrey Sachs who however could not begin his advisory work in Poland because so far he could only show advisory work he did in Bolivia. So Soros set up another one of his many foundations, the "Stafen Batory Foundation", which then in turn was the official client for the advisory wotk of Sachs in Poland (1989-90).
In Soros' own words he has worked or still works with the main advisor of Lech Walesa, Bronislaw Geremek, with General Jaruzelski, Professor Trzeciakowsky, a secret advisor to the new Polish minister for finanve and economy Leszec Balcerowicz, and with the latter himself. Soros admits that he had known that his economic "shock therapy" in Poland would lead to severe unemployment, to the closing of factories and to social tensions. That is why he insisted that Solidarnosc take over the government. Through his foundation he could approach the most important opinion makers in the media, like Adam Michnik, and his collaboration with the US embassy in Warsaw enabled him to censor the media which proceeded onesidedly to support his "shock therapy" and opposed any criticism.

Russia and the CIS states: Soros led a delegation to Russia, where he had been collaborating with Raissa Gorbacheva since the 80's, to set up a further Soros foundation, ":The Cultural Initiative Foundation". This is a further vehicle for him and his Western cronies to enter the highest political echelons tax-free and proceed to "buy" the most important political and economic personalities of the country.

After a failed attempt with Gorbechev 1988-1991 he changed over to the circles around Yeltsin. And again it was Soros who introduced his "shock therapy" aided and abeted by his friend Jeffery Sachs. From Jan. 2, 1992 onwards Sachs "shock therapy" brought an unprecedented chaos and a forseeable hyper-inflation to Russia which was followed by the best scientific research institutes fleeing to the West. Under the Soros plan, Igor Gajdar and the Yeltsin government shorted subsidies to industry and agriculture drastically, despite all of economy being a state-economy. The goal announced was a deficitfree budget within 3 months. There were no more loans for industry, the companies accrued astronomical debts and the rouble inflation went out of control. Soros and his friends immediately profited from the situation. Marc Rich, the world's largest aluminum dealer, started to buy up alot of Russian aluminum at incredibly low prices with which in 1993 he proceeded to flood the market in the industrialized countries and thus caused the price of aluminum to plummet by 30%. This is just one example of the Soros exploitation. Hungary : When Istvan Csurka, parlamentarian of the national-socialist opposition, tried to protest the destruction of the Hungarian economy by the strategies of Soros and his friends, he was branded an "anti-semite" and in June was excluded from the governing Democratic Forum.

Yugoslavia: At the beginning of 1990 Soros --in cooperation with the IMF--in what was then still Yugoslavia put down the gauntlet for what then escalated into a war. Soros is also a friend of the then secretary of state Lawrence Eagleburger, the former ambassador to Belgrade and patron of Slobodan Milosevic. Eagleburger was formerly chairman of "Kissinger Associates" on whose board Lord Carrington (Committee of 300) member also sits. The latter's mediations have directly fueled the Serbian aggression against the Croats and the Bosnians. Today Soros has foundations in Bosnia, Croatia, Slovenia, and a "Yugoslav Soros Foundation" in Belgrade/Serbia. In Croatia he uses funds from his foundation to hire influencial journalists or to discredit opponents of his "shock therapy" as anti-semites or neo-nazis.



uživajte!

Po moje so ozadja tista, ki razkrivajo Sorosa kot povampirjenega globalista, ki mu gre predvsem za ustvarjanje dobička - pri čemer pač uporablja "nevojaška" sredstva, s katerimi povečuje svoje dobičke (za razliko od Bušistov, ki to počnejo povsem odprto vojaško).

Gre preprosto za to, da Sorosa enako boli kurac za vse skupaj, kot Buša, le da tega ne pove tako odprto (u bistvu laže in zavaja). Isto velja tudi za njegova pisanja, ki so bolj kot ne metanje peska v oči - očitno je namreč, da Soros svojih akcije ne počne kot nek finančni mag (samo z intuicijo in poznavanjem mehanizmov) temveč predvsem kot močan insajder s pomočjo finančne mreže znotraj katere deluje (s poznavanjem mehanizmov in informacijami, katerih ostali nimajo).

Tu so se naši ekonomisti v devetdesetih izkazali za velike carje, saj niso nasedli njegovemu kolegu Jeffery Sachsu, ki nam je prišel svetovati, kako naj preidemo na tržni sistem (to napako je naredilo večina držav vzhodnega bloka).


užiavajte!