Madan Gopal Das wrote on 15.02.2005 at 09:50:25:


Hm. Maš prav .

Jaz še vseeno menim, da je realnost le naša subjektivna resničnost skozi določitev ali pač mistificiranje doživljanja.  

Quote:


To lahko vodi v solipsizem oz. je taka percepcija lahko že izraz solipsizma, ki pa je po moje sam po seb že eden od (po moje nesupšešnih) poskusov razrešitve uvodnega pardoxa.

Ful `močna` beseda - "paradox", a ne?

Nekaj definicij za paradox:

• (logic) a self-contradiction; "`I always lie' is a paradox because if it is true it must be false"

• a statement that appears to contradict itself, for example, suggesting a solution which is actually impossible (cfTortoise and Hare Race).

• 
  a figure of speech in which an apparent contradiction contains a truth

• apparent contradiction or discrepancy with common sense.

• a self-contradictory phrase or sentence

• a statement that appears to contradict itself or be absurd but that may be true. Emily Dickinson?s statement, "Much madness is divinest sense" is an example.

• a statement that contradicts or seems to contradict itself, yet often expresses a truth, such as "Less is more".

• a statement that seems self-contradictory, yet may nevertheless be true.

• a seemingly contradictory statement that may nonetheless be true.

• a contradictory statement in logic, typically including two or more mutually exclusive elements; also used here to indicate a situation not resolvable by logic, such as theinfinite regress of the total field. Paradoxes can only be resolved by subjective choices according to context, using the intuitive mode; the logic-dependent scientism of 'applied science' can only resolve paradoxes by denying that they exist, with results that are often unfortunate.

• an assertion that seems self-contradictory or opposed to common sense.

• a contradiction or illogicality, contrary to expectations

• a statement that seems contradictory but may actually be true, as in "That I may rise and stand, o'erthrow me," from Donne's "Batter My Heart, three-personed God." Close Window

• in logic and mathematics, an apparently absurd or contradictory conclusion that follows from one or more compelling-at any rate, plausible-statements or premises. Some paradoxes cannot be solved without fundamental revisions of the human conceptual apparatus. One example is the paradox of the liar. The sentence "This sentence is false" seems to be well-formed and meaningful. Yet, it is true if, and only if, it is false, that is, not true. This paradox apparently forces either a restriction of the expressive power of language (so that the liar sentence cannot be formed) or a rejection of the compelling principle that a sentence is true if and only if what it says is true. Over 2,000 years after it was first posed, there is still no agreement among philosophers as to its resolution. Another example is Russell's Paradox (named after Bertrand Russell).

• an argument which seems to justify a self-contradictory conclusion by using valid deductions from acceptable premises.

• an assertion seemingly opposed to common sense, but that may yet have some truth in it. *What a pity that youth must be wasted on the young. George Bernard Shaw (A Glossary of Rhetorical Terms with Examples, Ross Scaife)

• a statement that appears to be contradictory but is not, such as "increases in product quality often result in a decline of the cost of producing the goods."

• a statement that initially appears to be self-contradictory but that, on closer inspection, turns out to make sense.

• a statement which at first appears to contradict itself but is in fact true.

• a statement which seems on its face to be logically contradictory or absurd, yet turns out to be interpretable in a

• the appearance of two qualities of Being that appear to be opposite, yet are co-existing and non-separate

• a seemingly contradictory statement which is actually true. An idea which embeds a contradiction. (Example: "You can't get a job without experience, and you can't get experience without getting a job".)

Bardo_Thodol wrote on 15.02.2005 at 11:43:50:


kaj misliš v katerem jeziku se pogovarjamo, beremo in pišemo v TELEPATŠČINI?


tko, da pustimo malenkosti, ej, lahko se pa tud haklamo na njih, kakor komu prav

Petra. wrote on 15.02.2005 at 13:52:50:


Fata: "Ajdemo ovim taxijem!"
Meho: "Ma ženo, nije ovo taxi nego tahi ili sam ja Mexo iz Bixača."

Bardo_Thodol wrote on 15.02.2005 at 11:43:50:



ni kej, Bardo_Thodol da na slovnico ... ga občudujem, včasih vse tako do vejice natančno napiše , da si potem rečem ... Siaj, ja kam si pa ti v šolo hodila ...

ja, res je, paradoks ni nujno nerazrešljiv, tudi nič slabega, v bistvu je ena zelo fajn zadeva, morda je le začasna ovira, ki jo mišljenje lahko preseže ali pa celo meja v smislu totalne meje do katere mišljenje dospe, naprej pa ne gre več

ker dostikrat je ravno poprejšnje vedenje, znanje, mnenje, ki ga že imamo, ovira spznanju nečesa novega

včasih je potrebno to zavreči, zmetat stran med staro šaro

je pa vprašanje koliko smo že ujeti v krog, v katerem je jezik sam nosilec in model in to se kaže kot blokada

mene zanima katere prepozna vsak znotraj in zunaj sebe-eni raje teorizirate-pa mamo vsi prav, pa itak se vse dogaja z
namenom




118933