Mislim, da je ponekod po svetu tako, da morajo verniki plačevati za to, da se tudi formalno lahko deklarirajo kot verniki.

Lilith wrote on 17.01.2005 at 13:55:54:




Seveda - preprosto se uvede cerkveni davek, in davek cerkvi. Cerkev in ostale verske združbe naj se tretirajo kot pridobitniške organizacije in za svoje delovanje plačajo tudi davek.

Vsi lastniki plačujejo davek na nepremičnine, razen Cerkve, poleg tega je Cerkev ena od organizacij, pri kateri se nikoli ne ve, koliko denarja šiba okrog v raznih kovčkih. Totalno mafijsko. Siva ekonomija na kvadrat!


uživajte!

v bistvu je vse kar je treba to, da vsak pri sebi najprej razčisti

lih zdele hude nevihte sončeve spet;)
http://www.n3kl.org/sun/noaa.html



First I will start with a MSNBC article released Wednesday suggesting what we are seeing today in the way of escalated earth changing events are “cycles” the Earth has seen many times before. I’m sure this put a sour taste in the mouth of environmental zealots who have spent millions of dollars and endless energy trying to manipulate you into thinking “you” were solely the cause of today’s warming/cooling trends. In fact, there were a few zealots who even tried to connect the tragedy of the Indian Ocean tsunami with so-called global warming. But as soon as they received a negative backlash, they let it go.



The title of the MSNBC article reads “Is Something Wrong With Mother Earth?”. The answer is NO. The article goes on to pose the question…”Should we be worried?”

"The world is not coming to an end," says NASA scientist Dr. David Adamec. "Things are fine." Dr. Adamec studies the Earth and says there is no scientific data (whoops, the environmental zealots aren’t going to like that) to suggest all this violence from the Earth, at the same time, is unusual. In other words…it is all about natural cycles the Earth has seen many times before. Full Article



So what is it that drives these ‘natural cycles’? It is the Sun! Scientific data clearly shows a symbiotic causal connection between the Sun’s solar cycles and Earth’s extreme temperature changes. A team led by University of Maine scientists has reported finding a link between changes in solar activity and the Earth’s climate. In a paper due to be published in an upcoming volume of the Annals of Glaciology, Paul Mayewski, director of UMaine’s Climate Change Institute, and 11 colleagues from China, Australia and UMaine describe evidence from ice cores pointing to an association between the waxing and waning of zonal wind strength around Antarctica and a chemical signal of changes in the Sun’s output.



Equation:

Sunspots -> Solar Flares (CME’s) -> Magnetic Field Shift -> Shifting Ocean and Jet Stream Currents -> Extreme Weather and Human Disruption (mitch battros)



At the heart of the paper, Solar Forcing of the Polar Atmosphere, are calcium, nitrate and sodium data from ice cores collected in four Antarctic locations and comparisons of those data to South Pole ice core isotope data for beryllium-10, an indicator of solar activity. The authors also point to data from Greenland and the Canadian Yukon that suggest similar relationships between solar activity and the atmosphere in the northern hemisphere. They focus on years since 1400 when the Earth entered a roughly 500-year period known as the Little Ice Age. (whoops, I wonder how many SUV’s and smoke stacks were available in the 15th century. So much for so-called global warming theory)



Before I go forward and completing the driving forces of Earth’s weather and climate, and for the first time introducing what may be the driving force of the Sun’s cycle, let me make my routine announcement. I Mitch Battros, am in full support of a “clean air and water” mandate. I believe fully in being responsible for my immediate community and for the world community. I believe in recycling and all methods of maintaining a clean and sustainable environment. This is something we do have within our power and I advocate holding responsible all those who violate reasonable stewardship of our home “Earth”. But this has nothing to do with so-called global warming. This is something the environmental zealots created to facilitate getting their “government grant money” and attempt to procreate their cult. There is no credible sustainable scientific data which suggest “we” are the cause of current or past extreme weather,! earth change events, or rapid climactic changes. This is a “lie”. In short…what I am saying is the Earth would experience what we see today, and what is to come, If There Were No Humans On Earth.



Now for something really exciting… a recent study conducted by professor Glennys Farrar, a physicist at New York University, New York City, has used a new analysis technique to identify ultra-high-energy cosmic rays (UHECRs). This could in fact be the very substance, or energy field that drives the cycles of the Sun.



UHECR’s appear to be mostly protons and atomic nuclei. Magnetic fields - with an unknown source which accelerate the particles to almost the speed of light. This makes UHECRs so energetic that some astronomers doubt that even the most extreme cosmic events, such as the explosive birth of a black hole, could account for their power.

Professor Farrar says the underlying source of the cosmic rays could be a long-lived process - such as a super-massive black hole slurping up surrounding matter - or magnetic shocks produced by the colliding galaxy clusters. Or it could be produced by a sudden, cataclysmic event like such as an explosion of matter and energy that signals the birth of some black holes, giving off a gamma-ray burst.



Farrar is presenting her findings on Thursday at a meeting of the American Astronomical Society in San Diego, California. Full Article



So perhaps my new Equation will read:

UHECRs -> Increased Solar Activity -> Sunspots -> Solar Flares (CME’s) -> Earth’s Magnetic Field Shift -> Shifting Ocean and Jet Stream Currents -> Extreme Weather and Human Disruption (mitch battros)



116888  

Petra. wrote on 17.01.2005 at 15:22:37:


Kolektivne katastrofe zgledajo čist najmanj primerne za  samostojen razmislek, ker ravno v njih najbolj pride do izraza občestvena solidranost članov  posameznih cerkva in istitucionaliziranih religij, na katero se folk opre, ko razpade naravno okolje, v katerem se počut varnega.

Paradoks je v tem, da pol folk začne svojo varnost povezovat s pripadnostjo občestvu, strah pred izgubo pripadnosti temu  občestvu oziroma strah pred konkurenčnim  občestvom pa začne   začne občutit za hujšo grožnjo kot grožnjo  naravne katastrofe same.

Zarad tega tud medetični spospadi na verski osnovi postanejo folku čist sprejemljiva oblika lastne smrti in smrti drugih, čeprav terjajo dost več življenj kot vse naravne katastrofe skupaj.  Tle jest vidm tud povezavo med krutimi medeitičnimi spopadi na verski osnovi in odvisnostjo folka od nepredvidljive narave. Ne gre torej tolk za to kot stojči pravi, da narava 'kaznuje' folk za njihovo hudobijo, ampak za to, da se folk neustrezno odziva na naravne pojave in se zateka po varnost v religiozne sisteme, ki jim te varnosti ne morejo zagotovit (v bistvu se vzdržujejo na permamentni grožnji s katstrofo), zato krivdo za lastno neposbnost mečejo na konkurenco.

Posredno bi se morda celo dalo trdit, da je hubobija folka kriva, da  je tolk žrtu naravnih   katasrof, saj se prav zarad religiozno/etičnih konfliktov folk ne uspe zedinit, da bi si varnost zagotavljal globalno s pomočjo informacijske tehnologije in bolj  varne arhitekture.
 

V tem smislu so religije hujše od tsunamijev.

Bardo_Thodol wrote on 18.01.2005 at 10:19:08:

se strinjam.

sam se morm prostovoljno preda(ja)t Bogu in takrat mi On hoce in mi tud bo vedno pomagal.

Madan Gopal Das wrote on 18.01.2005 at 10:23:57:


Če si pod predajanje predstavljaš pridobivanje in širjenje znanja, potem se strinjam.

Če si pa pod predajanjem predstavljaš samo recitiranje verzov in prosto veseljačenje, pa mislim, da je to malce premalo ...